Pastor John,
I listened to the Saturday fireside chat and you talked about making some changes to your Old Testament translation, in particular, using the word “church” instead of “house” and/or “temple” in certain cases. The example you brought up was Psalm 5:7:
“But as for me, in the abundance of your loving kindness will I enter your house. I will worship toward your holy temple in fear of you.”
You said that in this verse you suggest using the word “church” instead of “house” and leaving the word “temple” as it is.
I have heard you before talk about the origin of the English word “church”, and saying that it comes from the Greek word “kuriakon” (I have also translated the gospel tract titled “The Church?”* into Hungarian, where you say the same thing). You have also explained that kuriakon literally means “the house of a lord” or “a lord’s house” which, I assume, points to the pagan notion of there being “many gods and many lords”.
Now, here in Psalm 5:7, David is speaking/praying to Jehovah, so when he talks about entering “your house”, he must be referring to the holy temple (actually at this point it was still the Tabernacle, if I’m not mistaken) that God had chosen to put His presence into; the one place where the children of Israel could acceptably worship God, by keeping the ceremonies and rituals commanded to them through Moses.
So, my question is: Will it not communicate a wrong idea to the readers about what
David meant as Jehovah’s “house”, if you’re going to use the word “church” in this verse? Wasn’t God’s chosen place to worship (the Tabernacle and then later, the
Temple) indeed a unique, holy place in the Old Testament; and will not the word “church” (a house dedicated to ANY deity) actually question that idea of the Tabernacle/Temple being the ONLY place where God could be lawfully and acceptably worshipped?
I hope I was able to make my thoughts and my question clear.
Zoli
=========
Hi, Zoli.
Yes, that was very clear, and understandable. Here is my reasoning for the change.
All earthly religion, whether in the ancient world or now, is church-based religion, except for the Faith revealed by Christ. His alone is a holy, Spirit-based religion. That was the wisdom revealed to the apostle Paul, and it set his gospel apart from even the gospel Peter preached, which included keeping the law.
Israel’s religion, under the law of Moses, was as much church-based as were the religions of the heathen. Zeus’ temples were churches; Islam’s mosques are churches; Jewish and Buddhist temples are churches. What made Israel’s religion holy and unique is that God really did give that law; all others were man-made. In AD 325, when the emperor Constantine, with the apostate believers who joined him, devised the new religion of Christianity, that religion was church-based; it was not revealed to Constantine or those apostate believers by God. It became the religion of the empire (and the basis of Western society) because Rome had the muscle to enforce it, but it was, and is, a church-based faith; it was not from God.
I don’t know a better way to communicate the uniqueness of Jesus’ blood-bought, Spirit-based Faith than to contrast it with all other religions, by calling them all, including Israel’s ancient religion, church-based. The church, which was central to Israel’s ancient religion, was the house of God in Jerusalem. To build it was commanded by God, but it was still a church, the only holy church that has ever been in the world.
Paul’s way of saying “church-based” is “in the flesh”. All religions on earth, including ancient Israel’s, are “in the flesh”. Jesus delivered us from all fleshly, church-based religions, so that we may now worship God “in spirit and in truth” instead. I think that distinction is important enough to emphasize it by calling the house of God in the Old Testament what it really was: a church. To do so, I think, will help people understand Paul’s revelation from Jesus. That revelation was misunderstood and rejected in his time, even by most believers (cf. 2Tim. 1:15), and it remains misunderstood today.
I hope that clarifies why we have decided to re-translate some biblical references to Israel’s temple as a church.
Pastor John
* Going to Jesus.com Tracts – The Church?
Tell us what you think: