Thank you so much for replying.
I also appreciate you explaining religion is not the goal which I agree with.
When I asked if only true believers will speak in tongues, I was trying to imply that as we both probably agree on, only those who have been born again can speak in tongues. Other religions (like early Mormons or Hindus) can claim what they want but that is only reserved for those who have been born again (are Christ-followers).
But just to be sure I am understanding you correctly: are you saying the speaking in tongues is evidence that a person has been born again? In other words, if someone claims to be regenerate but they have never spoken in tongues, does that mean they are not regenerate?
Thank you for your time.
Dominic
=========
I hope this makes what I am saying clear:
“But just to be sure I am understanding you correctly: are you saying the speaking in tongues is evidence that a person has been born again?” YES. “In other words, if someone claims to be regenerate but they have never spoken in tongues, does that mean they are not regenerate?” YES. What men claim means nothing.
If I have again not made myself clear, please keep trying. I’m sure I can do it if given enough chances!
God bless.
Pastor John