Hi John,
Amy and I read through the first part of the Acts notes last night, and it is feeling so good reading through it again. Boy, it has really been stirring up some thoughts!
Amy said she went through some corrections with you this morning, and she asked you my question about whether or not there is a difference between a “resurrected” body and a body that’s been raised from the dead, and you told her that there is a difference. The reason I had wondered is because of your comment, “It is unlikely that a resurrected body would actually feel hunger….” (from your note under Luke 24:43).
We got to talking about this at lunch today, and I remembered one key difference between Jesus’ body after he was resurrected and the bodies of those who were raised from the dead (e.g. Lazarus): Jesus’ resurrected body contained no blood. Then I got to thinking about how the life is in the blood (Lev. 17:11), which means that Jesus the human son of Mary, his natural life, no longer existed, for it was no longer in the body that Peter and the other apostles saw – only the life of God was there in that body. Then Amy pointed out that in the Old Testament, animal sacrifices were made only after the blood was drained from them. This is how it was with Jesus when he offered his crucified body to God for the sacrifice! You probably have already told us that, but for some reason it just clicked today 🙂
Are there any other differences between a resurrected body and a body raised from the dead? Is Jesus the one and only case of a human being resurrected?
===========
The New Testament speaks of a first and a second resurrection that will occur at the end of this age. I assume that the first resurrection is called “the first resurrection” because it is the first of its kind (after Jesus, of course), and likewise, the second resurrection. At the same time, the Bible records a number of people being raised from the dead, even in the Old Testament, and none of them are said to have been “resurrected”.
===========
Another part that we were talking about is the scene in Acts 1, when Jesus answers his disciples’ question, “Is this the time you will re-establish the kingdom of Israel?”, and Jesus’ response is, basically, to tell them not to concern themselves with those things, but to just go to Jerusalem to receive power and to be his witnesses. Then Jesus is taken up into the clouds and disappears and they are left wondering (I suppose) why he left them before he even set up his earthly kingdom! Then God sent the two angels to let the disciples know that Jesus would return in the same way that he left. I wonder if they thought that that was why Jesus wanted them to go and wait for him in Jerusalem, because that’s where he was going to show up again, out of the clouds? That would certainly be incentive to go and wait for him there! It is really something how Jesus labored to get them to the place (both physically and spiritually) where they could receive what he so much wanted to give them.
===========
That’s a good point, Vince. Jesus ascending into heaven would not have made the disciples stop looking for Jesus to set up an earthly kingdom. My, what did they think?
===========
It felt really good reading and talking about these things. There were so many other thoughts that we were having, but these are two that really stood out to me. Thanks for doing this study, John. It has been wonderful so far what Jesus is able to show us now that we have a better understanding of the Father and Son!
Vince