Send us comments on Twitter!
Watch What We Do!
  • Billy’s dream – Carolina

    Good morning, Pastor John.

    In my dream I was giving a presentation on Mark 12:30: “And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment.”

    Brother Earl and you were sitting behind one of the white tables; there were others sitting there, too, but I didn’t recognize their faces.  I knew they were some of us sitting around you. 

    I began by saying, “There are four things that Jesus commanded us to do in this scripture.  We are to love God 1) with all of our heart  2) with all of our soul 3) with all of our mind.  Then, I went on with my presentation. 

    You stopped me and reminded me (as you were smiling), “Billy, there are four”.  And I replied, “Thank you, that’s right; Number 4) and with ALL thy strength.”  Then the power of God fell on us and I woke up.

    I went to my music room about 5:00 AM, and started looking up all the scriptures on strength.  There are many!  But what was so fascinating to me, especially in Psalms, were the many scriptures David was using (there are too many to list), stating that his strength came from God and not of himself.  Then I noticed that Job, Moses, Paul, and many other faithful wise men in the Bible, as well as today, know that any strength at all comes from God.  Jesus even said that he could do nothing unless it comes from his Father.  We know this, but it sure is wonderful when God allows you to feel it in your heart.

    I was playing Darren’s CD, Going Home To Carolina, when the that song started playing, while I was getting ready for work,  “I’m Going Home To Carolina . . .Going Home to be with family and friends . . .”  when all of a sudden, the Spirit fell (like it did in my dream), and I started speaking in tongues and praising God, while I was flossing my teeth — It can be done!  🙂  The Spirit spoke, “Carolina is a matter of the heart”.

    Wow! . . .  I just yielded fully to what I just heard.  You have taught us Over and over again that moving to NC is not what’s it’s all about, but that having fellowship in the light of the Spirit, no matter where you live, is the point.

    The Spirit started speaking to me, “You are already in Carolina,  Carolina is in you . . . It has been there since 2001, when I put it in you.”  I couldn’t take it.  I had to fall down on my face and say, “Amen, God!  It is; it has been; it is there — no one can take this away from me, God.”

    I am so thankful for the ones who have been able to move to NC, and very happy for them, and I do pray that God will allow me to move there one day.  Not to be in a different location, but to experience the daily fellowship of God with y’all.  If He does, then it will be such an added bonus and blessing . . .  if He doesn’t, then Carolina is, and always will be, in my heart, and I can be content with that.

    Hope all is well, and hope to see you soon.

    Billy 

     

  • Cris M on the Creation debate

    http://debatelive.org

    Hey,

    I watched a little over an hour of the debate last night before having to get the kids to bed. The one question that I kept feeling when listening to Bill Nye was, “Where is the love of God in that?” That feels like such a cold way to live, with just man, all on his own. Our own experiences tell us that can’t be, and it made me feel sad for him.

    This crossed my mind last night, too. The Creator himself asked me the question about eight years ago, “Who created science?” 🙂 When the question came, the answer was obviously the One who was asking me the question. What in the world would Mr. Nye do with that!? 🙂 Poor thing. It’s God’s science, and like Brother James says, “He can be right any kind of way He wants to!” He doesn’t have to be “predictable”.

    Cris
    ===============

    Amen, Cris. It seems to me that sane people would choose to believe there is purpose and love in the universe. The hopelessness in the doctrine of evolution is palpable. We humans are of more value than that, and I can’t help but feel that even the most ardent evolutionists can sense that fact.

    Pastor John

  • Vince on the Creation Debate

    http://debatelive.org/

    Hi John,

    Amy and I also watched the creation debate last night, and I, too, was disappointed in both sides. Mr. Nye was much more confident and at ease in his debate style (though sarcastic and contemptuous at the same time), and Mr. Ham seemed nervous, unorganized, and unprepared to answer the tough questions. As a result, Mr. Nye basically controlled the entire debate, and Mr. Ham was constantly on the defensive. I couldn’t understand why Mr. Ham kept using the Bible as his primary evidence for creation to someone who doesn’t believe the Bible (I think lawyers call this “begging the question”). From what I have read and heard other creation scientists say, just about everything Mr. Nye put forth as evidence for evolution has been refuted, but Mr. Ham didn’t offer much of the existing scientific evidence in his couterarguments. I wondered why no one asked Mr. Ham the question, “Would you still believe what you believe if the Bible didn’t exist?” And I wondered why no one asked Mr. Nye some of the tougher questions also, such as, “How do you explain, using the theory of evolution, the irreducible complexity of any given living organism? For instance, did the heart, blood, arteries, veins, capillaries, and cells all evolve at the same time? If not, which one of these components could be absent and still make for a viable circulatory system?”

    With all that said, though, I also feel the same way everyone else has already said, that the witness of the holy ghost – the power of God – was the key thing missing from the creation side of the debate. Like Gary, I also wondered what would have happened if Mr. Ham could have testified of an experience that he had with God, and the power of God fall and he begin speaking in tongues, and everyone in the audience feel the presence of God. I found myself praying for both men this morning, especially Mr. Ham, that they would have a real experience with Jesus – one that would trump all of their own thoughts and ideas about the Creator of heaven and earth!

    I have seen other creation scientists, such as Kent Hovind, do a much better job of presenting the scientific evidence in this kind of debate, but also without the truth and the power of God. In the case of Kent Hovind, he became rebellious and arrogant with his knowledge, and now he’s in prison for tax evasion. So, perhaps God will only allow men to go so far in trying to “prove” God exists with their own knowledge – but still use them to get people thinking about Jesus, and considering a side other than the side that’s continuously forced down everyone’s throats these days.

    I was reading in Deuteronomy 29 this morning, and these verses really stood out to me, in light of last night’s debate:

    2 And Moses called unto all Israel, and said unto them, Ye have seen all that the LORD did before your eyes in the land of Egypt unto Pharaoh, and unto all his servants, and unto all his land;3 The great temptations which thine eyes have seen, the signs, and those great miracles:4 Yet the LORD hath not given you an heart to perceive, and eyes to see, and ears to hear, unto this day. (Dt. 29:2-4)

    Even God’s own people, let alone the world, can’t believe the things He has done or understand the truth unless God gives them the grace to believe it, or see it, or hear it, or understand it. It makes me very thankful that Jesus showed me, just a few short years ago, how foolish I was to believe in the whole evolution thing. But there was no way I could have all of a sudden decided to stop believing in evolution and started believing in God, without God giving me an experience to let me KNOW, not just believe, that He is real, and that He loves us and cares for us.

    Vince

  • Rebekah on the Creation Debate

    http://debatelive.org/

    Not only did Mr. Nye keep saying “Ken Ham’s model”, but he kept referring to the beliefs of Ken Ham “and his followers” as if it was so obviously a cult. Very cunning, & very annoying. Also — he was so “civil” until his last five minutes, when Mr. Ham could no longer respond, and then I thought he really let loose. That was cunning also: “I’m sorry, but you have utterly FAILED to answer my questions or prove your case, Mr. Ham!” Very crafty debate tactics. But as everyone has said, the thing that would’ve confounded all of that, the power of God, was absent.

    On a side note… It kinda made me wish we could watch the debate tactics of Lincoln & Douglas. I’m sure that would’ve been interesting. (But then again, maybe not — b/c debates stress me out!) Debating itself seems like it’s becoming a lost art form, in a way.

    Rebekah

  • Damien on the Creation Debate

    http://debatelive.org/

    Pastor John

    I have difficulty in watching this type of thing but I did listen to the last 45 minutes or so, and it was enough to make me want to hear the rest of it.

    For his part​,​ Mr. Nye was at least civil. Very often in this type of thing the pro-evolution side is extremely sarcastic and disdainful – I mean extremely! He kept it under control. For him to put himself in that situation has already, and will continue to bring him some flak from the scientific community.

    Ken Ham struggled at times, primarily because the Spirit is entirely left out the picture. The truth about the holy spirit will cause division among Christians, as it should, so he and his ministry avoid the subject. They would say that such matters are irrelevant to believing the Genesis account. It is like a court case where the defendant is not called as a witness by his own side for fear of what might happen under cross-examination. The witness of God is never allowed on the stand and it hurts me to see it. If only they could be happy to let the spirit of God do the cross-examination and rejoice in the results. That is why I have trouble getting involved with these events.

    One thing I thought that Ken Ham missed badly was Nye’s bizarre concern for the future of America’s science if Creationism is allowed into the picture. Many great scientists from the age that ushered in the beginnings of our technological era were bible believing Christians who would never have questioned the matter. It did not stop science developing at all. In fact, it may well have been connected to God blessing them with increased understanding. I thought Ham let Nye repeatedly state his opinion on this matter without any rebuttal (at least in the time I was listening.) Nye is portraying belief in God as being incompatible with good scientific endeavor.

    I love Ken Ham and still have a soft spot for his ministry. The man has “guts”. The opposition and ridicule he has faced for years, and especially over the building of the Museum (which was just an idea in 2000), would beat down many a man. They were part of what God used in turning me back toward Him back in 1999-2000 when the “Creation Bus” visited the town 50 minutes west of us. Their mission is primarily to Christians who have belief in the Bible. They are not really a disprove evolution to the evolutionists ministry. They correctly point out that a watered down view of Genesis undermines the whole of salvation history given in the Bible. Their seven “C’s” of history: Creation, Corruption, Catastrophe, Confusion, Christ, Cross, Consummation are OK but they need another, “Conversion”. Nevertheless, they strive to help people hold on to Genesis being literally true and show them that science does not necessarily preclude those things being true. If the debate helps people hold on to simple belief, maybe it will help some find their way to Jesus.

    It makes me think on what you said about “we”, the people of God. We are a mess. We have let go the things of God. Psalm 74 came to mind. I long for the day God answers prayers like this one. It is interesting that it references creation as much as it does.

    Damien

    1 O God, why hast thou cast us off for ever? why doth thine anger smoke against the sheep of thy pasture?
    2 Remember thy congregation, which thou hast purchased of old; the rod of thine inheritance, which thou hast redeemed; this mount Zion, wherein thou hast dwelt.
    3 Lift up thy feet unto the perpetual desolations; even all that the enemy hath done wickedly in the sanctuary.
    4 Thine enemies roar in the midst of thy congregations; they set up their ensigns for signs.
    5 A man was famous according as he had lifted up axes upon the thick trees.
    6 But now they break down the carved work thereof at once with axes and hammers.
    7 They have cast fire into thy sanctuary, they have defiled by casting down the dwelling place of thy name to the ground.
    8 They said in their hearts, Let us destroy them together: they have burned up all the synagogues of God in the land.
    9 We see not our signs: there is no more any prophet: neither is there among us any that knoweth how long.
    10 O God, how long shall the adversary reproach? shall the enemy blaspheme thy name for ever?
    11 Why withdrawest thou thy hand, even thy right hand? pluck it out of thy bosom.
    12 ś For God is my King of old, working salvation in the midst of the earth.
    13 Thou didst divide the sea by thy strength: thou brakest the heads of the dragons in the waters.
    14 Thou brakest the heads of leviathan in pieces, and gavest him to be meat to the people inhabiting the wilderness.
    15 Thou didst cleave the fountain and the flood: thou driedst up mighty rivers.
    16 The day is thine, the night also is thine: thou hast prepared the light and the sun.
    17 Thou hast set all the borders of the earth: thou hast made summer and winter.
    18 ś Remember this, that the enemy hath reproached, O LORD, and that the foolish people have blasphemed thy name.
    19 O deliver not the soul of thy turtledove unto the multitude of the wicked: forget not the congregation of thy poor for ever.
    20 Have respect unto the covenant: for the dark places of the earth are full of the habitations of cruelty.
    21 O let not the oppressed return ashamed: let the poor and needy praise thy name.
    22 Arise, O God, plead thine own cause: remember how the foolish man reproacheth thee daily.
    23 Forget not the voice of thine enemies: the tumult of those that rise up against thee increaseth continually.”

    ​===============

    Thanks, Damien.

    I loved the feelings I felt when reading Psalm 74. That song is probably more applicable now than when David first sang it. God help us!

    I, too, have a hard time watching such things as that debate ​last night, but once it began, I was glued to it. The impression I had was that Jesus was going to use it to help some of his less courageous people overcome the bullying spirits of this age, vis-a-vis the truth of Creation. It was advertised well, and I am thankful that the truth of Creation was given the exposure it got last night. The major news organizations have to be by-passed in order to put the lies they promote to the test. Last night, that happened to a significant degree.

    ​Mr. Nye was contemptuous and sarcastic​, even childishly so at times, but as you say, he kept it somewhat under control. His continual reference to “Ken Ham’s model” as opposed to “those of us on the outside” [that is, outside Ken Ham’s little following] was irritating, especially when he continued saying that after Mr. Ham pointed out that it was a false suggestion. One of the most unexpected elements of the debate for me was how much Mr. Nye resorted to slanderous suggestions instead of focusing on scientific facts. I thought he would come to the debate jam-packed with one observable scientific fact after another. It struck me how few evidences he offered the audience. That made me wonder if those evidences even exist. Why else would he not bring them to the table, resorting so often to childish, though muted, negative innuendo instead.

    I also had this thought: Maybe Mr. Nye was not the best representative of the evolutionist position. I found myself wanting to hear more about his evidence for evolution. His best evidence, presented early on and referred to repeatedly, was the total lack (according to him) of certain small fossils mixed in the fossil record with fossils of a larger kind. I appreciated Mr. Nye’s pointing that out. It was thought-provoking.

    ​All in all, I thought the debate could have been much better, on both sides.​

    Pastor John

  • Amy F on the Creation Debate

    Good morning,

    Richard and I watched the debate as well. In the TFM for 2/4 “Responses to the Elect” you wrote a response to Bob’s question regarding the demons knowing who Jesus was. Part of your response was this…

    “I could not know more than I know now that the story of Noah and the ark is true even if archaeologists found the remains of it in the snow-capped mountains of Ararat next week. Physical remains mean nothing to my faith because by faith I already understand that the power of God tore this earth apart and spared Noah and his sons and their wives with the ark, and I need no physical evidence. I have felt the power of God.”

    It’s in our experiences with the power of God, His Spirit that gives us understanding & knowledge. Ken Ham did do the best he could do with his human understanding and knowledge. I am praying that God will show him the rest of the story too!

    Amy F.
    ===============

    Thanks Amy.

    Those who missed it can see it replayed anytime in the next few days, as I understand it, at www.debatelive.org

    Pastor John

  • Gary on the Creation Debate

    http://debatelive.org/

    Hi John,

    I too watched the debate last night and you pretty much captured most of what I thought… I did have a couple other observations.

    I thought there were two defining moments in that debate. The first was when Mr. Nye was asked if he had other proof besides radiocarbon dating of the age of the earth. It seemed at that moment that God completely confounded that man. He didn’t know what to say or do, because he doesn’t have any other proof. It seems his agenda was “science to the rescue for our country.”

    The second, and kind of sad to me, was when Mr. Ham was asked what proof he had for his six day literal creation, and all he could do was point to a “book,” the bible. Because he had no experience with God, or knowledge of the power of God, he had no experience to present to them. Instead of being an “authority,” (from God) all he could present was another view of another man.

    I had to wonder what would’ve happened had he told about a new birth experience and the power of God would fall on him, and he would start speaking in tongues, or healing people, or whatever God would choose to do… And the presence and power of Jesus would really fall, and God would demand an answer of all present. The debate would have been over!

    Mr. Ham declared the name of Jesus, and a lot more truth, all in a national venue. That’s got to count for something in this hour, because we are so weak. God bless him for that. And I believe he already has in some ways. Maybe he will take him all the way. I hope so.

    But if the power of God really fell, and the truth were really known and spoken, I had to wonder….what side would Mr. Ham be on? How we need men of God, with something from God in this day.

    It it was good to watch something that had some value in it, (instead of a lot of the normal TV stuff that we see). I went to bed prayerful, playing out the scenarios in my mind, etc. I was very glad I watched it.

    Gary

  • Creation Debate

    http://debatelive.org/

    Hi, Pastor John;

    Tom and I were watching the debate last night. After Ken Ham gave his 30 minute presentation, the Spirit of God fell briefly and we were praying for him. My spirit was saying, “God, that’s got to count for something. . . God help him.”

    Bill Nye was saying that he wants to discover the origin of Creation and the beginning of Life, and Ken Ham, kept repeating to Bill Nye, “I know a book”. I so wish he was filled with the Spirit of God and say like the song that Brother Earl sings, “I Know A Man”. But, at least Ken is doing the best he can with the knowledge his has. He just needs the Revelation of Jesus in his heart — it sure does make you want to pray for him.

    I was telling Tom, “It’s a matter of the heart”, as you say to us all of the time. Hearts that are for Ken Ham will sway to him, and hearts for Bill Nye will lean towards that way.

    I thought, “Wouldn’t it be wonderful if they found Noah’s ark, tomorrow”? Tom said. “It wouldn’t change anything in Bill Nye”. I said, “Yeah, though if one would raise from the dead” . . .and one has, Jesus. But, at least it would present another argument for Ken Ham and maybe set more people on course to seek Jesus.

    I thought the same thing Aaron N. did about sending Ken a copy of the Father and Son book. I just want to pray for that man.

    It really makes you appreciate the holy Ghost, “The Witness ” which the Father has given concerning His Son.

    Billy
    ===============

    Hi Billy.

    We watched the debate here, too, and we had some of the same feelings that you and Tom were having. “I know a book” is one thing, but “I have been touched by the power of God” is so much more. Offering men the Bible as our best evidence of Creation misses the mark, somewhat the way that pointing to an empty grave as our best evidence of the Resurrection. God has given us His Witness – the Spirit! Oh, that Ken Ham was able to offer that testimony to the world! I was on my knees later, after everyone here was in bed, praying for him, asking God to bless him for his effort, and asking God to fill him with the real witness to Creation, and the Resurrection, and everything else the Bible tells us – the baptism of the Spirit.

    There were other thoughts I had after the debate which applied to the other man. During the question and answer period, someone asked each man what it would take to change his mind about what he believed about evolution/creation. That other man, obviously an atheist, responded by suggesting that he would change if someone could show him an example of one kind of fossil mingled with with another kind of fossil in a particular kind of rock. He was not telling the truth. He will never change because he is a proud fool. “The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God” (Ps. 14:1), and fools cannot learn, even if you try to pound truth into him. “Crush a fool in a mortal with a pestle along with the wheat, and still, his foolishness will not depart from him” (Prov. 27:22). “A reproof entereth more into a wise man than an hundred stripes into a fool” (Prov. 17:10). Without mercy from the God whom they mock, even erudite fools such as the one who debated Ken Ham last night will not believe, Jesus said, “even if one rose from the dead” (Lk. 16:30-31; see also 22:67).

    Let’s pray that God will raise up prophets, apostles, teachers, pastors after His own heart, healers and miracle workers – men who will have the knowledge and power to present to the world God’s testimony to His Son. How sad it is that the body of Christ is so weak and divided that words are all that it seems to be able to offer the world in defense of the gospel, for as Paul said, “The kingdom of God is not in word, but in power.” The saints need a refreshing, Billy, if we are ever really going to be witnesses to this lost generation of the Savior it needs so much.

    Pastor John

  • Ken Ham – Bill Nye debate

    http://debatelive.org/

    Hey there,

    Abby and I watched the Ken Ham, Bill Nye debate tonight. Ken Ham definitely had a much cleaner, better feeling to him than anything Bill Nye said or implied, not even mentioning the actual facts.

    Ken Ham had very good points, etc, but he was missing the critical piece of the puzzle! The proof that Jesus died for and sent back for us to live right…the holy ghost. He didn’t understand Paul’s gospel for the Gentiles, and it showed up as areas he didn’t look so comfortable in and wasn’t able to answer as clearly. Abby and I prayed afterwards that God would show him the rest of the story!

    I sure hope God blesses him for doing what he did and sticking up for His Son, and not even avoiding some controversial issues, such as abortion, homosexual marriage, etc! That was a surprise to me…going there took a lot of strength on his part. He’ll get a lot of backlash from saying those things from everyone and not just from evolutionists.

    Ken Ham left a good, moral, godly feeling. . . which is way more than can be said for Bill Nye. I just hope God shows him the rest of the story. Ken Ham said a couple times something to the effect that, “If you seek God with your whole heart, He’ll show you His truth.” I pray that he keeps seeking and finishes the story. And I hope that he never stops showing us new truths, either. That’s where life is. That’s where that “joy of discovery” is. Makes me want to seek God more, too.

    I sure am excited about the Father and Son book getting wide distribution. Abby even mentioned maybe we could send Ken Ham a copy.

    Aaron N.

  • Teaching Series on Galatians

    Good morning Pastor John,

    On the way into work this morning I was listening to Galatians.  It was so good.  Every time I listen to it, I get something else!

    You were reading the part where Paul was telling about Abraham’s sons – one of the free woman and one of the slave woman – and how he was comparing that to the Jews and the Gentiles.  That was so good! I was thinking how it must have been “hard” for the Jews to hear that message, just as it is still “hard” for people to hear it!

    Just made me so thankful Jesus gave me ears to hear and a heart to love it!  Also to have a Pastor to preach it like Paul……the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth!

Recent Posts