Mailbag

Send us comments on Twitter!
https://youtu.be/gVZOxqojW-g?si=jTPkeTDV8hDt_XxU
Watch What We Do!

Search

Looking for something specific? Try a search below!

  • Anna

    http://www.pastorjohnshouse.com/video/filluswithglory.html

    Hey Pastor John,

    I was sick all this past weekend with coughing, body aches, and a slight fever. Lower back pain developed, but I figured it was just part of the body aches. For the most part, everything went away by Monday, but the lower back pain persisted. When I would cough heavily, my lower back would solely hurt, so much that I would have to brace myself anytime I had to cough.

    As I was driving home last night, I started to worry about it since everything else had gotten better. I was already dreading going to the doctor. As I was trying to figure out what I was going to do, I flipped on the CD that was in the player and just told God that I knew He could take care of it all. I wasn’t really hearing the words of the song (“Fill Us With Glory Now”), but immediately when the words “creator of the soul” were sung, which seemed to be amplified, this love and sweetness completely saturated me. My eyes were pouring with tears before I even had time to think. Every inch of my being knew it was Jesus coming to take over the situation, and it felt so peaceful and soothing.
    (I did a few test coughs to see if the pain was still there, but it was long gone.)

    Whether the pain in my back was kidney or bladder related, or simply a strained muscle, the pain and concern that I had about it completely left.

    I know I shouldn’t be surprised that when I pray, God hears it, but it was such a fast and thorough response; I am so thankful for the experience.

    Anna Drane

  • Doctrinal Influence

    Pastor John,

    Could not perhaps the law of Moses and the OT priesthood be the most influential “pagan” influence to shape Christianity? Is not the Eucharist a reoccurring sacrifice offered to God? And because of the need to sacrifice there became again the need for a priest, one similar to the Levitical priests who had authority to administer His ceremonies?

    =============

    What a remarkable insight, Michael! Yes, that is exactly the case. When God finished with and abandoned the works of the law of Moses, those works became as empty of value and, therefore, as “pagan” as any religious rite that the Greeks, Romans, and other pagans performed.

    =============

    Did perhaps the Judaizers in fact overcome Paul’s doctrine? Not so much on circumcision but in denying the hope and promise we received with The Holy Ghost thanks to Jesus’s FINAL sacrificial offering.

    =============

    Yes, Paul lost that battle, according to his own words: “All they of Asia have forsaken me.” The whole book of Galatians was written because those Gentile saints had been persuaded to forsake the gospel that Paul preached and to follow Peter’s gospel of the circumcision instead. There is hardly a letter Paul wrote which does not deal in some way with that issue; it is a main topic of most of them.

    In time, those Gentile believers even twisted those works of he law and devised their own form of them; hence, “Christian baptism”, Christian “holy days”, etc. But the root of all those pagan works among NT believers is that in the beginning, Gentile believers in Christ were persuaded by Judaizers to add the ceremonies of the law to their faith.

    I would not say that the Judaizers overcame Paul’s doctrine, however. I wouldn’t phrase it that way. It seems more correct to say, as Paul did in one case (2Tim. 2:18) that the Judaizers overthrew the faith of Gentile believers. Paul’s doctrine still stands, and it will meet them all in the Judgment, both the Judaizers and those who were deceived by them.

    =============

    If so, my only question is, is not Hebrews so explicitly clear on this subject that it can’t possibly be denied? Is the book of Hebrews not in the Catholic Bible?

    =============

    Ha! Yes, it is in there. But it is not understood. Had Churchmen understood Hebrews, they would have declared it non-canonical long ago. In fact, I am persuaded that if Churchmen of the past had understood any of the the NT books, they would have done away with all of it, in order to keep their status secure.

    =============

    And the more and more I read about the meaning behind the Eucharist, plus knowing what I know growing up Protestant, I truly wonder why Protestants even bother with it, even if it is only monthly in most cases. It’s like drinking a cup of tea that was made from a ten times already used tea bag.

    MD

    =============

    Practically all Protestant ceremonies are watered-down versions of Catholic ceremonies, just as Catholic ceremonies are watered-down versions of the OT law’s ceremonies. This is evidence as to why Protestant denominations are called “daughters” of the “great whore” in Revelation. Every Christian sect has the fundamental nature of the Mother of them all: Catholicism.

    Keep up the good work, and may the Lord give you understanding in all things.

    jdc

    =============

    I seem to recall that the canonicity of Hebrews was (and still is by some) doubted.

    djc

    =============

    Hi pastor John,

    This was very good I enjoyed reading it. While I was reading it, it reminded me of why king Jeroboam’s sin was so bad. He took the way that God had given his children to worship him and perverted it to fit what he thought would make it safer for him, because of the fear that he had in his heart that the people would turn back to David’s son Rehoboam as their king. So, John, would what the early Jewish believers did in the beginning, by trying to get the Gentiles to take on the old covenant, be the same as the sin of Jeroboam?

    Stuart

    =============

    It would be close, but not quite the same. Jeroboam’s religion was a lot like the rituals of Christianity; that is, it’s ceremonies and holy days never were of God. Both were wrong, though.

    jdc

    =============

    From: Bekah C.

    I wonder if by the time the Catholic Church was advanced enough to be completely opposed to what is really said in the book of Hebrews, etc., it had also already become too superstitious to dare touch the NT canon. Maybe that’s why they translated it into Latin and REFUSED to let the common person read it for centuries…? Maybe they did, to some extent, see the condemnation of their rituals in books like Hebrews, and therefore they did not want the book to be in the hands of the people — while at the same time, they were already too superstitious to eliminate certain passages, books, or the Bible altogether.

    ===========

    Well, that is certainly food for thought.

    jdc

  • Email From RWEA Website

    http://www.goingtojesus.com/tongues-at-spirit-baptism.html

    Greetings in the name of Jesus!

    In my research on the development of the religious system of Christianity, which system I have renounced in favor of Christ Jesus my Lord, I came across The Two Babylons, and then, of course, your two books related to that one. I just wanted to tell you that I was touched by your sincerity in making the effort and going to the expense of correcting your errors when you discovered that you had made them. I have been through similar situations, and I know what it takes to make that kind of choice, when it entails significant personal loss. (But what is the alternative if we truly love the Lord?) May God bless you for your integrity, and may He continue to guide you and yours to His ever-increasing light.

    Pastor John Clark
    www.GoingtoJesus.com

    ===============

    From: Ralph W

    Thank you for being in touch and your kind thoughts. I have looked at your website; this is quite a layout of subjects, etc., very well done. It seems you are saying that when one is born again he will speak in tongues. I have been to the location of the Azusa Street Mission in Los Angeles. A lot of the speaking in tongues that is well known today seems to have stemmed from this revival in 1906. But my question is: What about all the centuries before that back to the early church. Who spoke in tongues in those centuries or, the greater question, was anyone saved or born again in those centuries? I believe in speaking in tongues, so that is not an issue with me. Any thoughts? Blessings.

    ==============

    Thank you for your reply. Your question is perfectly reasonable, and everyone who deals with this subject has asked it, or should have asked it.

    Of course, you know that the baptism of the holy ghost with the evidence of speaking in tongues was being experienced and taught before it was made famous at Azusa Street, by people from Kansas and Texas, etc. But even at that, the issue of a marked absence of the testimonies of such people in the historical record from the days of the apostles still must be addressed. Were it not for a few suggestive episodes and comments scattered throughout the historical record, one might assume that Spirit-baptized people did not exists at all from the time of the apostles until the Azusa Street revival (I have also been in that area several times, visiting my daughter who is in graduate school at Fuller Seminary).

    It is common knowledge that the surviving historical records of Western Culture were made and maintained by Churchmen. These Churchmen, as their own records show, were so devoted to their faith that they did not often wince at resorting to cruelty or injustice in dealing with those who dared to oppose their power. We know that, for example in the case of Arius, the Emperor Constantine used the full weight of his empire to eradicate Arius’ influence after the council of Nicea. All of Arius’ writings were ordered destroyed (none survive), he himself was exiled, and any home in which Arius’ doctrine was taught was confiscated by Empire and turned over to the Catholic Church. The only information about Arius that was allowed to survive was that which Churchmen themselves wrote about him. It was entirely in their hands as to whether or not any records concerning Arius would remain.

    An even more interesting character is Montanus. At the critical time when the Catholic Church was taking shape, while charismatic assemblies were swiftly fading from view, Montanus (according to the records left by Churchmen) denounced “the whole catholic church under heaven.” The very few sentences from Montanus which Churchmen recorded for posterity strike me as exactly what Paul or Peter might have said in similar circumstances. We cannot safely judge Montanus at all, whether he was of God or not, but he is an intriguing character. But the Churchmen of his time certainly condemned him, and the commentaries of Church scholars and Christian ministers follow suit. They typically trust the ancient opinions of those who hated Montanus without sufficient consideration of what Montanus might have seen happening to the faith.

    So, my answer to your very good question is that recorded history can only be as reliable as the recorders of that history. And if the recorders of that history were ungodly and unreliable, then an appeal to that history is fruitless in one’s search for truth. The recorders of history from the time of the apostles until the Reformation were servants to an iron kingdom which was committed to one goal: earthly power. And they brooked no dissent.

    It seems obvious to me that the deep, oppressive darkness which that evil Institution brought over mankind in the West lingered, even after men knew that the darkness existed, that the Institution was evil. Martin Luther, in the beginning, had no thought of leaving the Church. He just wanted the obvious corruptions dealt with. In his 95 Theses, if I remember correctly, he spoke very reverentially of the Pope, still calling him “holy father”, contrary to the expressed command of Christ (Mt. 23:0). So, I see the events subsequent to the Reformation as a gradual “waking up” of God’s scattered and confused people, drugged and drunk as all nations have been on the wine that is in the great whore’s cup.

    In sum, because of who has been in charge of the existing records, I cannot see recorded history as a just arbiter in the controversy over whether or not all who are baptized with the Spirit (i.e., are born of the Spirit) speak in tongues at the moment of their baptism. In the end, we cannot trust anything but the Spirit to guide us into to all truth, along with the Scriptures, which were inspired by and are rightly understood only by that same Spirit. This is why I wrote the little book, Speaking in Tongues at Spirit Baptism. I am convinced that the typical Pentecostal position (I am not a “Pentecostal”) is the correct one; to wit, that speaking in tongues (or “stammering lips”, per Isaiah) is the “initial evidence” of receiving the Spirit of God. If one can just put, for a moment, the religious system of Christianity out of mind, I believe that what the Bible says on the matter would be much easier to perceive.

    Thank you again for writing. I have been hoping, before too much longer, to visit some friends who recently retired to Palm Springs. If so, maybe we can find some time to sit down and chat.

    God bless.

    Your servant,
    jdc

  • The Cross

    Hey,

    Just an interesting thought while typing your notes from the book, Pagan Rome and the Early Christians. It talks a lot about superstition. In the section I am in now, “the sign of the cross” is being discussed. As I read it, I guess I have never thought of the “cross” as a sign of superstition. I kept typing and read examples of what people used the cross for, ie: those who wore the cross would be safe, worn to keep the bad spirits away, they walked around their house doing the sign of the cross in every room, before every meal, etc. The cross hanging around the neck is just like the wind chimes or the garlic around the neck: superstition. I know many people wear the cross as a “sign” that they love Jesus, but in all reality, it is just superstition. The way we live our lives shows how much we love Jesus. If we depend on the signs to save us from the “bad spirits”, we have missed the whole point.

    If you are wearing one of those crosses around your neck, it’s just superstition and throwing it away or putting it down does not mean you are betraying your Lord. I guess I had never thought of it that way. Thinking how much Jesus must hate that cross because of the reminder of the hurt and pain he suffered, I have jot wanted to wear one, but I had not thought of it as just being superstitious. Really, going through the history of Christianity and its beginnings, it is a religion full of superstition.

    Thought I would pass that along.

    Amy

    ===============

    Hi John,

    In a recent sermon on Livestream, you commented on how the word “hocus pocus” came about (I cannot remember the word it derived from, perhaps “habeas corpus”?) referring to certain prayers in Catholic ceremonies. Then there was the mention that the “Thought for Today” (9/18/04 in your book by the same name) was titled “Superstition”.

    It all reminded me of an experience I had several years ago. It was sometime in the 90’s and I had walked over to a rummage sale located in one of the buildings at the Catholic campus near my home. There were lots of tables set up with good used merchandise. Here is what happened in the blink of an eye: I quickly glanced over the items on one large table full of Catholic paraphernalia. I was familiar with the items and knew their usage. Rosaries, crucifixes with compartments to hold oil, the wafer, a vial of wine and such for the sacrament of ‘extreme unction’ (ceremony for the last rites), cloth necklaces called scapulars, etc. As I glanced over all this, I heard a whisper-type of inner voice. It gently said, “Voodoo”. I was not surprised by that remark, but quietly agreed. I tell this story whenever the situation welcomes it.

    From what you said on Livestream this morning about what you are learning with the Iron Kingdom work, I am sure that Christianity has been all that bad through the ages.

    I am more than glad that Jesus let me feel empty so that there was nothing else for us to do but to leave Catholicism in 1984. When you heard from Jesus in Spring 1994 that we are not Christians, I was relieved, because I didn’t know what name to give the called out ones.

    Suzi

    ===============

    Pastor John,

    I remember you talking about superstitions and about the cross. I use to have a cross hanging from my mirror in my car but after hearing that I took it down. I like what Amy said, it’s the way we live our lives that shows we love Jesus!

    God Bless,
     Michelle

    ===============

    Hi Michelle:

    In high school and college, I used to wear a “St. Christopher” around my neck. I thought it was cool. But when Jesus called me, that cross suddenly seemed very bad to me. No one had ever told me it was bad. It just seemed that way. So, I trashed mine, and went on to where Darren’s song tell us Jesus is: “Beyond the Cross”.

    jdc

  • Today’s Old Meeting CD

    Amy,

    If you remember, during the CD today, there was no time in either of those two 30-minute interviews with Preacher Clark that anyone shouted, spoke in tongues, or even said “praise God”. Instead, there was a calm, loving authority in the man, and authority that makes the humble in heart WANT TO BOW. The simple truth of God carried the power that we felt.

    During a very loud and excited Pentecostal meeting in Louisville more than 40 years ago now, I heard a young man say, “The anointing is really here tonight!” Everyone there, it seemed, agreed and said “Amen!” Later than night, on the way home from the meeting, my father brought up that young man’s comment and said, “They just don’t know what the anointing is. You can’t shout under the real anointing of God. The real anointing makes you quiet. It calms you down.”

    I was just a sinner at the time, but I have never forgotten what he said. What we felt today was the anointing that Preacher Clark was talking about. His confident, loving authority cannot be imitated. It was altogether in the Spirit. The world knows nothing about it, but I ABSOLUTELY LOVE IT!

    =============

    Pastor John

    I concur with you and Gary! Hearing the cd this morning did something wonderful. I feel my whole being has been drenched with pure truth and love of God. When the cd was over and the Spirit fell on us all, my body was weak from the feelings of authority and truth. I love those feelings. What else is there?

    I really can’t say it the way I feel it, but it’s still there! Praise the Lord!

    Amy

    =============

    John,

    To me, the thing which always comes to mind with your father is he was immovable from the spirit. No matter what he was discussing those opposing him or those for him he was the same.

    His tone and steadfastness is astounding.

    EZEK 3:9

    Wendell
    =============

    Yes, Wendell, Ezekiel 3:9 is an accurate description of his spirit. The amazing thing is that whenever God creates that degree of determination within a man, he then becomes gentle and kind. God’s kind of firmness is not cold; it is very warm-hearted toward people, as those who knew Preacher Clark can testify he was.

    He often told us that if our friends can puff us up, or our enemies cast our spirits down, we are not yet “settled and established” in the Lord.

    jdc

  • What Do I Do?

    http://www.goingtojesus.com/tongues-at-spirit-baptism.html

    Name: Deborah S

    comments: I don’t speak in tongues and have been baptized. What do I do now?
    Is it keeping God from showing me my purpose? Thank you.

    ================

    Hi Deborah.

    Paul told us that we receive the Spirit through faith, and John told us that “If our conscience does not condemn us, then we have faith toward God.” So, I would simply encourage you to live so closely to Jesus that faith grows and develops in your heart. Do nothing that troubles your conscience. As Solomon said, “Guard your heart with all diligence, for out of it are the issues of life.”

    You MUST receive the baptism of the holy ghost, Deborah. Talk to Jesus about it. He will show you what he
    wants you to do.

    Pastor John

  • Paul Baptizing and Circumcising

    Hey Pastor John,

    I was just reading in the NT where Paul continued to baptize people after the holy ghost came, before and after they had received the holy ghost. He also circumcised Timothy, even though he knew it meant nothing, and knew that the real circumcision was of the heart. I was just wondering what the correct thing to do is in circumstances like these. I believe that his intentions were to not make someone stumble, especially if these were rituals that these people had been ingrained with. I also don’t want someone to think those things are necessary for salvation or that God’s spirit isn’t enough. This just kind of confused me because I can understand a few different point of views. Just wondering.

    Thanks, Terri

    ==============

    Hi Terry.

    It’s good to see that you have read your Bible, and really paid attention to it! Isn’t it amazing what questions pop up when we do that?

    Your question was “I was just wondering what the correct thing to do is in circumstances like these.” The answer is, “circumstances like these” do not exists any longer; so, we don’t have to worry about what we will do when you are in them.

    Paul was living in a time when the Jews were still required by God to keep the law of Moses and all of its ceremonies. If you pay close attention, you will note that Paul never baptized any Gentile with water, only Jews. And even then, he regretted baptizing with John’s baptism with water the few Jews whom he did baptize, in Corinth especially, “for”, he said, “Christ sent me not to baptize” (1Cor. 1:17). It was also for the sake of the Jews living in the area of Timothy’s hometown that Paul circumcised Timothy (Acts 16:3), whose mother was a Jew. According to Jewish tradition, if the mother is a Jew, the child is a Jew, and Paul wanted to present no stumbling block to the Jews when he went to their synagogues and preached the gospel to them.

    That time and those circumstances, however, are no more. The Jews who were alive at the time of John the Baptist have long since died, and the authority over the Jews which John’s message and baptism carried died along with them. Even before his death, Paul had begun shaking his garments at the Jews (Acts 18:6), symbolically signifying that he (and God) were coming to the end of any special regard for the Jews and that if they were going to be saved, they would have to submit to the gospel Paul preached to the Gentiles, and leave the law behind. The book of Acts ends with this angry warning from Paul to the Jews, whose minds were now blinded by God to the gospel (Acts 28:18): “Be it known, therefore, unto you, that the salvation of God is sent to the Gentiles, and that they will hear it!” The Jews who walked away from Paul that day did not know that they were walking away from eternal life and into the arms of Death himself, who was waiting with open arms for them – holding on to the ceremonies of the law which God had now all but finished using for their good.

    That is why those circumstances no longer exist for us, Terri; God has finished with the law of Moses. Paul was alive during a special time, when the law of Moses was still in effect for some people, the Jews, while the gospel for the Gentiles had begun to be preached. That is why you see Paul preaching one thing (no ceremonies – to the Gentiles), and occasionally doing another (practicing ceremonies for the sake of the Jews).

    Let me know if you still have questions.

    Pastor John

  • Iron Kingdom Introduction

    John,

    I just finished the Iron Kingdom introduction again. I think I could read that forward 10 times, and not tire of it.

    I believe that intro is among the best writing you have ever done. It held my attention throughout some very complex history there, and I found myself in tears about 2/3 the way through it this afternoon. That God would have me here, in this time, in this hour, with this understanding. It was more than I could take.

    I felt so thankful to be here taking in the marvelous things God has revealed to you. We are among the most blessed. Everyone needs to hear this truth.

    Gary

    ===============

    Hey John,

    I finished reading the Iron Kingdom Introduction, and I can hardly believe that you wrote this over ten years ago. How wonderful and up-to-date it is! I especially loved the “Foreward”, which I have read over and over again. It is the “who” that needs to be understood here, then, the learning follows. God help us and God’s children everywhere so that when this history, their history, is revealed, they will love it and obey it. They need much prayer and we need much to continue. This is the best history of Christianity and the Roman Empire anywhere, and not only history, but truth! I am thankful to be a part of the work God has given us to do. I am not sure when it will all take place, or if we will even be here when it does, but just to know that “the Lie” (and the “liar” who is behind it all) that is killing our brothers and sisters will be exposed by this book, gives me much to look forward to!

    What a day that will be!
    Amy

    ===============

    Hi John,

    I have read the forward and the Iron Kingdom introduction several times, and I love what I feel each time I read it. This morning I was reading it again and thinking about why I love it so much when I realized that you are telling who I am and what I believe! We are the body and are connected with you, and when you said, “I believe the Bible… Jesus has filled me with his Spirit and taught me, I am his servant” and “Christianity is an abomination…the saints must come out of Christianity…I am by the grace of God, a follower of Jesus, I am…not a Christian and not a part of the Church”, you were describing who we are and what we believe. This has been so good that I searched and found all of the Iron Kingdom emails that I had kept, and the Martin Luther email from a few years back, and I re-read them.

    Like Amy, I hope I live long enough to read this book, and if not, there is a satisfaction in knowing it will expose Satan and his work, Christianity.

    Randell

    ===============

    Hi Pastor John,

    I read the forward from Iron Kingdom…………wow! I never knew that Satan was cast out of heaven when Jesus ascended to heaven. I was at awe after I read it. It made Jesus even more precious. He was the sacrifice for everyone. My heart feels like its gonna burst with emotions. Love for Jesus, humility for what He has done. Disgust for the lie that Satan has been filling everyone and for how long this has been going on. Also blessed that my eyes and ears have heard the truth and my heart believes it. Thank you, I can’t wait for the rest!

    God Bless,
     Michelle

    ===============

    Dear John,

    I finally found the time to sit quietly , without numerous interruptions that plagued me for weeks, and read your IK Intro.

    The Forward was very honest and touching. Sincere. Simple. I liked that.

    The body of the Introduction was a masterpiece— not only of scholarship, but of brevity; in a detailed, articulate compilation of the history leading up to the establishment of the Iron Kingdom. The element that shone most brightly for me was your “conviction”. . . . and the “authority” by which that conviction is expressed. There is a fascinating intensity in what you’re describing, especially in the final paragraphs, which was chilling, and provoked anticipation for what is yet to come in the subsequent chapters. It is indeed a courageous work, and I am proud of you.

    I feel the holy Spirit’s voice speaking boldly in your writing (yet with a courteous, scholarly tone), although many will not discern that, and will criticize the piece for its audacity, no doubt. (Yay! Bring it on!)

    I have a question: Why did you use the word “Church” in the section on “Satan”?

    (. . .”The apostles later would teach the Church. . . ” and “Jesus is the hero of everyone’s story, whether the story of the Church on earth. . “)

    Sincerely,

    Brad
    ===============

    Hi Brad.

    The reason the word “church” was still in there is that the Introduction was written maybe 12-15 years ago. I remembered writing it, and feeling bad if THAT was the Intro I would need if and when I ever did actually get the book written. But so much time passed that I lost it! I didn’t know where that Introduction was. Not knowing that I had lost it, Amy happened to find it on her computer one day and sent it to me. That made me very happy! I did not have the time, until two days ago, to read it again for myself, though so many ppl told me how it affected them that I decided to share with you all without proof-reading it first. Since I have now read it, and marked portions of it for improvement, certain places will be changed, including the parts you mentioned.

    It was my feeling, before Amy rediscovered that Introduction, that with it, I had done my best, as far as introducing the subject matter and explaining my reasons for writing the book. I am more convinced of that now. When and if the book is ever published, that will be the Introduction that you will see in it.

    Pray for us, that we can get this book done. This past week, I was able to read 7 more books and prepare them to be typed, so that we can start gathering the necessary material together. One of those books, Vigilantius and His Times (written by an Englishman in 1832), is a book that I wish everyone in the body of Christ could read. It is very well written and it paints a sobering picture of the abomination of Christianity in the decades after Constantine imposed his version of the faith of Jesus on the world. It’s main focus is a young man, Vigilantius, who after years of watching and learning from them, spoke out against the practices of some of the “greatest” Christian rulers of his time, such as the veneration of relics, self-abuse and the mind-set of monks and hermits, and praying to dead saints. His most vicious critic was “Saint” Jerome, a man who is called by Catholics a “doctor” of the Church, and a man who had enormous influence in the civilized world of that time.

    John David found tonight that Vigilantius and His Times can be found and read for free at Google Books. I have not gone to Google books yet, but some of you may want to, just to see if you find this book as interesting as I did (even though it is almost 500 pages!)

    Thanks for your thoughts. Please continue to pray for us.

    jdc

  • Cremation

    I wanted to ask you what your biblical ideas were on cremation. I have been asking others as well, but I know my brother James would tell me to ask you. Thank you for all you are.

    Sheila A

    ==========

    Hi Sheila.

    Thanks for writing!

    I don’t think it matters at all whether or not someone is cremated.

    Now, if it were true, what the “apostolic fathers” of Christianity taught, and believers will be raised from the dead in their same old fleshly bodies, then maybe you would want to keep your body parts all together in one place, such as inside a metal coffin. But if it is true what the Apostle Paul taught, and we are raised up with spiritual bodies, then who cares what happens to this fleshly temple once we’re finished using it? Your body is going to turn back to “dust” or “ashes”, no matter what you do. Cremation is a just faster way to get it there.

    The biggest benefit I can see to being cremated is that the dead person’s family avoids the extremely expensive burial procedure of the typical Funeral Home.

    Pastor John

  • Why Is It Not Clear?

    http://www.goingtojesus.com/tongues-at-spirit-baptism.html

    Name: Daniel B

    web comment:

    I recently read your book on Speaking in Tongues at Spirit Baptism. I’m a recent graduate of Bible College and an Assemblies of God pastor, so your book sounded intriguing.

    I appreciate the spirit of humility with which you wrote the book. That was refreshing and respectable.

    I know that an argument from silence is a huge faux pas, and I make it with some reluctance. But to be honest, I find it difficult to believe that speaking in tongues is essential to the new birth when it is spoken of so little! Would not our gracious God make it more clear….even by flat out telling us that this is what Tongues really is?
    What are your thoughts on this?

    =============

    Thank you, Daniel, for your comments.

    My thoughts have been, in a way, your thoughts. Why in the world would God not make it more clear concerning the testimony of the Spirit being the evidence of the baptism of the Spirit (which baptism is undeniably the new birth)?

    I cannot presume to know God’s mind on this, but I do know this much: if the Scriptures had made the new birth as clear as we think we would like them to be on the subject, the wicked men who ruled Christianity the last two millennia, who had unbridled power and complete control of Western culture, would have either destroyed the Scriptures or altered them. I am utterly convinced that the only reason that the Scriptures survived for us as well as they did is those who preserved them did not understand them. God “blinded their minds”, and they did His will. So, maybe the wisdom of God is in the fact of the fundamental truth of all the gospel, the new birth, was not made so plain that the ungodly could see it.

    If you stop to consider the issue of the new birth in the NT books, you will meet with the incredible, but undeniable fact that it is never made absolutely clear when or how the New Birth is accomplished. I am sure there must be at least a few, somewhere, but I personally have yet to meet a Christian minister who has considered the question, “When were the disciples born again?” And among those who have dealt with that question, from what I have heard, there are a number of conflicting answers rendered.

    So, it is not just that the NT does not make it perfectly clear, whether or not everyone speaks in tongues when they are baptized by the Spirit into the body of Christ (1Cor. 12:13). At issue is the fact that the New Birth itself, the very bedrock upon which the whole life of every believer is built, is never made plain in the NT — unless it is as I have described it in my booklet, Speaking in Tongues at Spirit Baptism. If what I have said is true, everything else makes sense — even if it exposes the ceremonial religious system of Church religion to be worthless in the sight of God. (I am aware of the enormous ramifications of that.) If, however, what I am teaching is not true, then I am a false teacher (as many contend that I am), and we all are left again in the darkness of our own opinions as to when the Bible teaches that a person is born of the Spirit.

    If I may, I would like to suggest my little book, Spiritual Light. In the chapter, “Taking the Lord’s Name in Vain”, you will learn why I teach that it is unwise, and completely unbiblical, for anyone to claim to have already “gotten saved”. That chapter is a good starting point for this discussion.

    May God be with you, and bless you and yours is my sincere prayer. We here greet you in the name of the Lord, and in his love. I hope you feel welcome to respond to this letter in any way you please. I certainly hope that you will.

    Your servant in Christ,
    jdc

Recent Posts